Two revenue numbers.
One meeting.
Month-end runs late. Reports take manual work. Every new question becomes another reconciliation project.
Reporting slows decisions.Turn fragmented data into trusted decisions.
For mid-market companies running multiple systems, where consolidated reporting is slow, manual, and quietly mistrusted.
One number, agreed upon by everyone who reports it.
Common entities. Agreed definitions. Clear ownership.
Illustrative architecture · Designed around your systems
The friction often starts before the dashboard. It starts with what your data means.
Month-end runs late. Reports take manual work. Every new question becomes another reconciliation project.
Reporting slows decisions.Customers, products, calendars, and hierarchies differ across systems. Metrics lack written definitions and clear owners.
The model is unresolved.Tooling gets bought before the model is settled. The reconciliation work arrives later, during a more expensive build.
Architecture needs to come first.We specify what gets built, prove it on your real data, and give your team or vendor a plan they can build from.
Six concrete deliverables, with one contested metric modelled and reconciled end to end. Design grounded in your actual systems.
For every shared entity—customer, product, calendar, organization, vendor, and location—the master definition, source-of-truth ranking, matching logic, survivorship rules, and treatment of change over time.
Which fact tables exist, at what grain, and why. How transactions from different ERPs conform to a shared structure, and where they deliberately remain distinct with a documented business rationale.
Every field and source mapped to the target model, with transformation logic in business terms. Missing data, unreliable fields, and process changes are named explicitly.
Every metric defined in writing, with an owner: calculation logic, filters, time intelligence, and roll-up hierarchies. A definitions register your team can maintain.
Target layers, ingestion patterns, orchestration, and refresh cadence, with total cost of ownership. The option to keep what you have is costed alongside the alternatives.
Three to five delivery phases, with effort estimates in person-weeks and the skills needed for each. Every phase ends in something the business can use. Written so a vendor can bid against it.
Scope: design, specification, and one proof-of-concept metric. Production pipelines and full platform implementation are separate engagements.
We pick your most contested metric—often consolidated revenue—and model it across your actual ERPs. Then we show it reconciling. The proof build is part of every Blueprint, because the design needs to survive contact with your data.
A defined sequence from discovery to a demonstrated model and a documented handoff.
Schema-level work and focused sessions with your system owners.
Shared entities, matching rules, and workshops to resolve conflicts.
Grain decisions, source-to-target mapping, and gap analysis.
One metric, modelled end to end and reconciled on your data.
Architecture, total cost of ownership, and delivery sequencing.
Documentation, leadership presentation, and a build-ready plan.
Start with clarity. Design the target state. Keep the implementation aligned.
A focused read of where reporting breaks: systems, ownership, and definitions. You leave with a recommendation, including when the answer is to do nothing yet.
Fixed scope, agreed before we start.
Discuss an assessmentThe target model, mappings, definitions, architecture, and build plan. One metric proven on real data. Ten weeks from discovery to handoff.
Two to three source systems.
$60,000+ for four or more systems, multiple entities, or complex hierarchies.
40% kickoff / 30% midpoint / 30% delivery.
Keep definitions, vendor decisions, and delivery aligned with the design. A consistent owner for the roadmap between funding cycles.
Advisory or build supervision.
$9,000/month including build vendor management.
We can review delivery against the specification before it becomes load-bearing.
We can run selection against the specification and manage delivery on your side of the table.
You own the design. We can keep the roadmap current until the business is ready.
The work should make your next decision easier—and your next investment better informed.
If the problem is process or ownership rather than architecture—or there’s no one to build the design—we say so before you spend.
The target state should be reachable. Streaming, real-time systems, and complex patterns belong only where the business needs them.
We take no vendor fees. We cost the option where you buy nothing new. Sometimes that is the right recommendation.
Design, specification, and one proof metric. Production build work is scoped separately so the engagement stays clear.
If a number cannot be reported until someone starts entering the data, leadership hears that finding directly.
The build plan is sequenced around usable business outcomes, so progress is visible before the entire platform is finished.
Founder · Data, Analytics, and AI Advisory
I started Signal North for companies with multiple ERPs, reports that take too long, and numbers nobody quite agrees on.
My background spans data, analytics, engineering leadership, and complex technology programs—including leading a data pipeline engineering team supporting Meta’s Ray-Ban and Oakley smart glasses through Affirma, alongside experience at Amazon and Microsoft.
The goal is straightforward: bring that rigor to mid-market companies, with an architecture they can understand, fund, and build.
Organizations mentioned describe prior professional experience, not Signal North clients or endorsements.
Tell us which systems you run, what leadership needs to know, and what’s getting in the way. We’ll start with a conversation.